Author Archive

Buy twice, to get it right once?

June 21, 2010

In any economy, who can afford to buy something twice, to get it right once?  We have all made bad purchasing decisions, from which we then read the independent reviews that expose the issues of a product.  Wouldn’t it be better to know that before hand?

This underscores the responsibility we have to be aware. There is an abundance of government, consumer and analyst organizations whose objectives are to protect us with unbiased opinion on the credibility of product claims. Unfortunately, Information Technology consumers have often lacked reliable and complete resources to distinguish hype from fact.

Filling the need for buyers to make informed midrange storage decisions, the Data Center Infrastructure Group (DCIG), recently published its 2010 Midrange Array Buyer’s Guide. This comprehensive report is the first of its kind. It has been independently produced through a methodical and statically valid approach, normalizing the abundant features available on 72 storage arrays from 21 different vendors.

Independent and with no funding from any vendor there is no guarantee of inclusion in the buyers guide.  The DCIG Midrange Array Buyer’s Guide provides a fair, unbiased testing and ranking for each product.  In one place, it offers all the information needed for buyers to choose the right data storage product for their business – the first time.

Through this Consumer Reports-style analysis, Nexsan won the competition with our premier storage solution, DATABeast®, achieving the number one ranking by a wide margin among all other midrange arrays.  DATABeast so far exceeded the results found in other midrange arrays that DCIG concluded it is as close to a Tier One enterprise class array as an organization can get, without the high cost.

Other Nexsan solutions included in the report are SATABeast®, SASBeast® and the Nexsan iSeries® 400i.  Each ranked exceptionally well in their respective class against well-known competitors.

Of course we are very pleased with the outcome, but we are even more pleased that the industry now has a report that buyers can reference to make informed storage decisions. Making informed decisions is always more financially efficient when compared to the cost of mistakes and the added expense of resolving them.  Using insightful knowledge is the most effective decision-making improvement anyone can make.

The DCIG Midrange Array Buyer’s Guide provides the detailed independent analysis important for these decisions, allowing you to buy it right the first time.

Download the DCIG Midrange Array Buyer’s Guide and view the results of this comprehensive report at http://www.dciginc.com/2010/06/free-download-dcig-midrange-array-buyers-guide.html

January 20, 2010

Deduplication

The Market Demands Improving Efficiency

Economic constraints have a major impact on the operations of data centers.  Focus remains on capital spending reductions and no new labor.  Still, data center complexity continues to grow, as larger amounts of data are stored.

Fortunately, nobody has lost focus; data remains the crown jewel of an enterprise.  It is for that reason that storage administrators purposely replicate data in their protection strategy.  Unfortunately, the by-product of data protection is mass data duplication, leading to compounded cost inefficiencies in storage capacity, power, cooling and floor space.

Addressing these challenges spawned the emergence of data deduplication; a process that searches for duplicate data objects and deletes them to free space.   Deduplication efficiency ratios range from 10-50 to 1, thereby allowing 10TB to 50TB of backup data to be stored on a single terabyte of physical capacity over time.

As capacity requirements are reduced so should capital expenses.  However, first generation deduplication really only shifted dollars spent in existing secondary backup storage to the addition of a new disk appliance used to capture deduplicated backup data.  Shifting expense from one to the other results in the benefit objective being lost.  The real financial benefit from deduplication comes when the enterprise receives both capital and operating expense relief.

To that end, late last year, Nexsan teamed with FalconStor to introduce an evolutionary deduplication system known as Dedupe SG.  Because it addressed issues previously left open, we called it the second generation of deduplication.

Users found that Dedupe SG proved to reduce aggregate capital and operating cost by 50%, floor space by 50%, power by 60%, and yet it is 73% higher performing than competitors.  It is a great accomplishment, to provide twice the efficiency at half the cost, but even with that, there was more that could be achieved.

DeDupe SG 2.0

The second release of Nexsan’s deduplication has arrived and is known as Dedupe SG 2.0. Improvements have been added in several key areas:

Availability

Data availability requirements are continuous, which is why DeDupe SG now offers a “HOT” standby appliance, mirroring the primary production appliance.   Normal for a mirror, if the primary DeDupe SG appliance experiences an outage, the “HOT” standby takes over, ensuring 24×7 availability for the most demanding applications.

Manageability

Dedupe SG 2.0 adds performance and manageability enhancements with the introduction of support from Symantec’s Open Storage Technology (OST).  OST enables NetBackup to be aware of duplicate backup images wherever they are.  Backup data can be managed directly from NetBackup, providing a consolidated view, whether local or remote.  When combining OST in a clustered server environment, a fully synchronized catalogue database can manage multiple locations delivering improved levels of backup and recovery automation.

Performance

Already a great performer, Dedupe SG 2.0 adds performance through OST.  Significant performance gains are further enhanced over new 10-gigabit interfaces.  OST is similar to a network protocol (like NFS/CIFS) without the overhead of the TCP stack with users seeing 1.5 – 2X performance improvements.

Additional landing zone cache has been added to allow larger backups to be captured, also enhancing performance.

Conclusions

As industry trends for storage growth and budget reductions continue, IT needs to do more with less.  Part of the solution is to eliminate mass duplication of files and associated capital expense.  Second-generation deduplication eliminates duplicate data, but uniquely cuts operating expenses by significantly reducing power, cooling, and floor space demand, making it the most significant economically beneficial deduplication system available.

In addition to all the financial benefits, with Dedupe SG 2.0, you can expect even greater performance, and less risk.

MAID’s Demise – Greatly Exaggerated!

December 14, 2009

Its difficult to read any of the IT press without running into stories underscoring the urgent need to be energy efficient. The boundaries of concern have stretched all the way to Washington, where Congress issued a law for the Environmental Protection Agency to prepare and report on the use of energy in Data Centers today and into the future.  In that report, the EPA paints a frightening picture which includes the prediction that 50% of all data centers will be unable to buy any additional power by 2012, because there will not be new power available to them.

The availability and cost of energy is of course not a new problem, which is the issue that Copan Systems addressed when it pioneered the concept of first generation MAID. While the idea is flawless, their implementation was fatal. Copan chose a design that allowed only 25% of the drives in an array to be powered on at any given time. The resultant issue was seen at the application level where inordinate wait times were not acceptable. This left the Copan system with very few places the technology worked well, typically archive, which then lead to a company failure.  The lesson learned will be remembered, saving energy is vital, but applications depend on performance.

The need to conserve power, space, and cost is accelerating, which is why Nexsan improved on the idea of first generation MAID in the release of the second generation known as AutoMAID. AutoMAID is implemented to allow 100% of the drives in an array to operate at full power. This eliminates the delay in response times caused from cycling power up and down to different parts of a system inherent to the Copan design.

With that issue out of the way, Nexsan’s performance is great, there are no issues whatsoever for applications, or anything else.  To contrast this, with Copan, about the only place you could use MAID was for an archive that had a very low reference rate or a backup repository. With Nexsan, you can use the disk for any application.  The only place you probably would not turn on one of the three levels of AutoMAID energy savings is in a high access database that serves a global market that is running full out 24 hours a day.  That may represent 10% of all applications.  For the remaining 90% of all applications, AutoMAID can save from 20%-70% of necessary energy, and it comes standard on every Nexsan storage system.

Nexsan’s next generation AutoMAID supports a highly efficient storage environment by delivering the speed applications demand while saving power (along with CO2 emissions), space, and costs.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.